Get in touch
0203 375 0330
gq@gqemploymentlaw.com
gq@gqemploymentlaw.com
Meet the team
Go to our profiles page
All the latest employment law news straight to your mailbox...
Meet the team
Go to our profiles page
| Mr Lacy worked for Northern Foods for many years before he left in 2012. He had a contract of employment from 8 April 2003 which contained no restrictive covenants. Read more... |
| Employment Appeal Tribunal confirms that the client for whom the activities are carried out needs to remain the same Read more... |
| Mr Knight was a mini-cab driver working with Fairway and Kenwood Car Service Ltd. There was an agreement between the parties which stated that Mr Knight was self-employed and provided that he would work on an “open-shift” system, which meant that Mr Knight could work “as and when [he] like[d]... [He had] the option to sign on and off any time that suit[ed] [him]”. He paid a weekly rent to Fairway and Kenwood even if he did not work. Read more... |
| Overturning the decision of the Employment Tribunal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has confirmed in the case of Logan v Celyn House Ltd that the principal reason for an employee’s resignation does not need to be a fundamental breach of the contract of employment in order for an employee to succeed in a claim of unfair constructive dismissal. Read more... |
| Another sickness case has recently found its way to the Court of Justice of the European Union. Read more... |
| The High Court recently provided some useful explanation on what the court will consider when deciding whether a restrictive covenant is enforceable. Read more... |
| A recent EAT case looked at whether a redundancy could arise in a situation where there was no reduction in headcount. Read more... |
| In a recent employment tribunal case, Mrs Konczak successfully sued BAE Systems for, amongst other things, disability-related dismissal. Importantly, the EAT stated that it was not unreasonable for a disabled employee to refuse a settlement offer, even where the ongoing litigation worsened the illness. Read more... |
| The long awaited High Court ruling on a dispute between 104 London-based bankers and Dresdner Kleinwort (now part of Commerzbank) over a guaranteed minimum bonus pool of €400m has been issued. Read more... |
| The Supreme Court has given its decision in Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes, but there is still no real clarity for employers on whether they can apply a compulsory retirement age. Read more... |
| In McKie v Swindon College the employee successfully sued Swindon College for negligent misstatement. Read more... |
| Smith and others v Trustees of Brooklands College related to a situation where, following a TUPE transfer, the employer and transferred employees agreed to change the contractual rates of pay. Read more... |
| Samsung Semiconductor Europe Ltd v Docherty is another interesting case in relation to fiduciaries. Read more... |
| In John Lewis Partnership v Charman, the EAT allowed an unfair dismissal claim to be brought beyond the usual three month deadline. Read more... |
| Eversheds Legal Services Ltd v De Belin serves as a reminder of the dangers of trying to avoid discrimination claims from a particular class of employee when making redundancies. Read more... |